RSS

Q and A: Can DNA Be Used To Identify Multiple Assailants In a Three Decade Old Rape?

20 Feb

Q: Was it possible in 1969 (or even today for that matter) to determine if a woman found dead in sub-zero temperatures was raped by more than one assailant. If so, how could this be accomplished? Could a pathologist conclude that the woman was raped, as opposed to consensual intercourse, even if there is an absence of physical evidence such as bruising? What language would the pathologist employ when writing his conclusions?  Could evidence from 1969 be preserved (how would it be preserved?) and used today to identified suspects through DNA testing?

D3

A: DNA for testing comes from the genetic material found in the nuclei of the body’s cells. Essentially every cell in the body contains a nucleus. The notable exception is the Red Blood Cells (RBCs), which do not contain nuclei. But, White Blood Cells (WBCs) do. DNA testing of blood tests the DNA found in the nuclei of the WBCs.

Adequate DNA samples for testing have been gleaned from semen stains, bite marks, sweat, sputum, hair, and saliva. Even from the saliva left behind by licking a stamp or sealing an envelope. In the case of saliva from stamps or bites, the DNA tested comes from the cells that line the mouth (called buccal cells), which are constantly shed into the saliva. Hair does not contain cells and thus no DNA, but hair follicles do. A single hair follicle may yield enough DNA for testing.

As you can see, very small samples might be enough.

DNA is a fairly hardy molecule and survives time, freezing, drying, mixing with other materials, and many other adverse circumstances. It does not survive heating, however. Heat denatures, or destroys, the DNA strands. It is important to note that DNA testing does not require intact cells, merely intact DNA. This means that clotted blood, dried semen, and tissue fragments found under victims’ fingernails might yield enough DNA for conclusive testing.

The sub-zero temperatures in your scenario would serve to protect the DNA and would thus help the coroner by preserving better samples for his evaluation.

Yes, he would be able to determine that there had been two assailants, since each would have his own distinctive DNA pattern. The finding of two different DNA patterns in the semen sample obtained from the victim would prove this and when the suspects were apprehended, each could be matched to his own contribution to that sample. Mixing the semen would not alter this finding in any way since each DNA strand would be unchanged. It’s not like mixing blue paint with yellow paint to make green paint but rather like mixing a bunch of tiny blue beads with tiny yellow beads. From a distance, they might appear as though they had melted together to form a green mixture, but on close examination, each tiny bead would be seen to have remained intact and separate. DNA strands don’t “melt” into one another.

DNA can last for years, decades, even centuries. It has been found in Egyptian mummies, exhumed bodies, and samples stored from very old crimes. Recently, DNA evidence linked Gary Leon Ridgway to the famous string of prostitute murders know as the Green River Murders in Washington State. The DNA evidence connected him to murders that occurred in the early 1980s. This was possible because the DNA was handled and stored properly. Typically, the sample is dried and placed in a non-reactive container such as a glass vial.

The problem of determining if a rape occurred is a question for the jury. Rape is not a medical term, but rather a legal term. The coroner could determine if penetration occurred and if semen was present. If he found trauma to the vagina or to other body parts that might suggest the victim was struck or restrained, he might conclude that in his opinion the intercourse was not consensual. Still, it would require a judge or a jury to determine whether a rape occurred or not.

Published in Suspense Magazine December, 2014

 

5 responses to “Q and A: Can DNA Be Used To Identify Multiple Assailants In a Three Decade Old Rape?

  1. Mary Lee Barton

    February 20, 2015 at 12:26 pm

    Thanks for noting this distinction: “Rape is not a medical term, but rather a legal term.” I never knew that before.

    Like

     
    • D.P. Lyle, MD

      February 20, 2015 at 4:25 pm

      Yes, a physician or a Coroner can say that there was trauma or penetration and that semen was present, but rape goes to intent, refusal, etc. Those are legal considerations.

      Like

       
  2. Cheryl B. Dale

    February 20, 2015 at 2:26 pm

    Good info!

    Like

     
  3. Mary Lee Barton

    February 20, 2015 at 4:26 pm

    Is “homocide” or “suicide” a medical term? Just curious.

    Like

     
    • D.P. Lyle, MD

      February 20, 2015 at 4:37 pm

      Not really as again it goes to intent. The coroner determines the manner of death and there are 5: Natural, accidental, suicidal, homicidal, and Undetermined—as sometimes it is difficult to distinguish one from the other. For example, if an addict is found dead from a heroin OD, it’s not natural but it could be accidental (took too much by accident); suicidal (goodbye cruel world), or homicidal (maybe his dealer thought he was a snitch and gave him pure heroin rather than the 15% stuff he was used to getting so when he injected himself he unknowingly gave himself a dose 6X larger than usual). To the ME these would look identical so the intent and by whose hand cannot always be determined.

      Like

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: